Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| -- | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 global score. Both phones in our current comparison come with the same Android 11 operating system, so you shouldn't perceive any difference in that aspect. The Galaxy S21 FE body is much newer, somewhat lighter and somewhat thinner than Motorola One Hyper.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a bit better CPU than Motorola One Hyper, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a bit sharper display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a little smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1080 x 2340 pixels, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a just a bit more pixels per inch of screen.
Motorola One Hyper features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have equal internal memory, the Motorola One Hyper also has a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit superior battery duration than Motorola One Hyper, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Motorola One Hyper has a better camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has a tinier aperture and worse video frame rates, and they both have the same (4K) video resolution, the Motorola One Hyper also counts with a lot better 64 mega pixels resolution camera in the back.
Although Galaxy S21 FE is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Motorola One Hyper. So if you want that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S21 FE, else you can save some money and buy the Motorola One Hyper, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.