Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 80.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-05-15 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.34 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| -- | Blue and Brown |
| Metal and Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a global score of 89.1, which is much better than the Motorola One Vision's 80.7 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a extremely newer device, and it is also a little lighter and a little thinner than Motorola One Vision. The Motorola One Vision and Samsung Galaxy S21 FE have really similar displays, because although the Motorola One Vision has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a bit higher pixels density and a little higher resolution of 1080 x 2520px.
Motorola One Vision has a much greater memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Vision also has a SD memory card expansion slot that admits up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has just a little better hardware performance than Motorola One Vision, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
The Motorola One Vision shoots much better videos and photos than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same video resolution, the Motorola One Vision also counts with a larger aperture for better low-light photography and a back facing camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy S21 FE features greater battery life than Motorola One Vision, because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.