Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-09-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.22 x 2.95 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| -- | Brushed bronze, Cosmic purple and Electric gray |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 450.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 128 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 12.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 25.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has an overall score of 89.1, which is much better than Motorola One Zoom's overall score of 80. Galaxy S21 FE's construction is way newer, lighter and somewhat thinner than the Motorola One Zoom. Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with just a bit better looking screen than Motorola One Zoom. Both of them have a higher amount of pixels per inch in the display, a display of the same size and exactly the same 1080 x 2340px resolution.
Motorola One Zoom has a way bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola One Zoom also has an external memory slot that allows up to 128 GB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a little bit better processing power than Motorola One Zoom, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has 2 GB more RAM memory.
The Motorola One Zoom takes better photographs and videos than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video definition, the Motorola One Zoom also counts with a larger aperture to take better low-light photography and video and a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S21 FE has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Zoom, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 4000mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE costs a lot more than the Motorola One Zoom, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.