Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 87 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2020-10-02 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.66 x 2.86 x 0.31 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| -- | Blush gold, Liquid mercury and Polished graphite |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | $ 1400.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.2 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2142 x 876 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 373 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a little bit better than the Motorola razr (2020), having a overall score of 89.1 against 87. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is a lighter phone than the Motorola razr (2020), but they have the same thickness. These phones have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System). Galaxy S21 FE features a bit superior processing unit than Motorola razr (2020), although it has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores.
Galaxy S21 FE has a bit sharper display than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a quite bigger screen, a little greater display pixel density and a quite better 1080 x 2340 resolution. The Motorola razr (2020) features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage capacity.
Motorola razr (2020) takes much better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has slower 30 frames per second video frame rates, and they both have the same 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, the Motorola razr (2020) also counts with a camera with a way higher 48 megapixels resolution and a larger aperture for better low-light photos.
The Galaxy S21 FE features a superior battery life than Motorola razr (2020), because it has a 4500mAh battery size against 2800mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is not only the best devices of the ones in this comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to others.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.