Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 11 | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| -- | Cyber shade |
| Metal and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 FE has a general score of 89.1, which is much better than the nubia Red Magic 3S's 75.8 global score. Galaxy S21 FE's construction is a lot newer, somewhat thinner and way lighter than nubia Red Magic 3S. Both phones in this comparison review use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy S21 FE has the previous 11 version and nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version.
Galaxy S21 FE has a little more vivid screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a quite smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same 1080 x 2340 resolution, the Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a bit greater quantity of pixels in each screen inch. The nubia Red Magic 3S features just a bit better performance than Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has 6 GB more RAM.
Nubia Red Magic 3S has a much greater storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 128 GB more internal storage. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy S21 FE, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The nubia Red Magic 3S counts with a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a larger camera aperture, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera in the back with much more megapixels.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE costs more money than nubia Red Magic 3S, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.