Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-01-11 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 403 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 9.9 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a general score of 91.3, which is slightly better than Galaxy S21 FE's overall score of 89.1. These phones include Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a newer 12 version while Galaxy S21 FE has Android 11, providing a couple nice extra features. Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is an older, a little bit thicker and heavier cellphone than Galaxy S21 FE.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE counts with a bit superior processor than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G. Both have the same number of cores and a 6 GB RAM. Galaxy S21 FE has just a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, although it has a bit worse 1080 x 2340 pixels resolution, a little bit less pixels per inch of display and a quite smaller screen.
The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior camera than Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has lower video frame rate, and they both have a same size diafragm aperture and the same (4K) video resolution, the Galaxy A52 5G also counts with a much higher resolution camera in the back. The Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior storage for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, and although they both have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy A52 5G also has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has a battery performance that's very similar to the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.