Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 89.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2022-01-11 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.13 x 2.93 x 0.31 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.00 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| -- | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Metal and Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 700.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.4 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2340 x 1080 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 403 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 SM8350 (5 nm) chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Kryo 680 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 6 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.63 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 12.00mm focal length |
| -- | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 9.9 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM, Dual SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 FE is better than Samsung Galaxy M20, having a general score of 89.1 against 78.9. The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE design is way newer, somewhat thinner and just a little bit lighter than Samsung Galaxy M20. Both phones in this comparison come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S21 FE has a newer 11 version and Samsung Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, giving you some extra features.
Galaxy S21 FE counts with a little more vivid screen than Galaxy M20, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per inch in the display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1080 x 2340px, the Galaxy S21 FE also counts with a little bigger display. Galaxy M20 counts with a quite bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 FE features just a little better performance than Samsung Galaxy M20, and although they both have 8 cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 FE also has 2 GB more RAM. Samsung Galaxy M20 counts with a bit longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy S21 FE, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
The Galaxy S21 FE shoots a bit better pictures and videos than Galaxy M20, because although it has a lower resolution camera, it also counts with a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and videos and a much better (4K) video definition.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.