Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.67 | 9.78 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 10 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-05-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.38 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 6.98 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Mirror black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Metal |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2310 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 398 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a general score of 11.67, which is better than LG Q70's general score of 9.78. Although it's the best cellphone in this comparison, Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is an a bit thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than LG Q70. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a more recent 11 version and LG Q70 has Android 10, so it provides the user a couple nice extra features.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much better looking screen than LG Q70, because it has a little bit larger screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and more pixels per screen inch. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has just a little better hardware performance than LG Q70, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra takes greater videos and photos than LG Q70, and although they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a much better video definition and a much bigger sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The LG Q70 counts with much more memory capacity for apps and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a bit better battery life than LG Q70, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG Q70, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Q70. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy S21 Ultra, otherwise you can save a couple dollars and get the LG Q70, resigning some features and specs.
