Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a lot better than Motorola Moto G Power, having a 98.1 score against 76.1. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a newer and a little bit thinner cellphone than Motorola Moto G Power, but it's also heavier. These phones include the same Android 11 OS, so both should give the same operating system features.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a bit faster processing unit than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has more RAM. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a lot better looking screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because it has a higher pixels quantity in each inch in the screen, a better 1440 x 3200 resolution and a little larger display.
The Moto G Power features a greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB. The Moto G Power's battery lifetime is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra's battery life.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture, it also counts with a lot more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a lot bigger sensor capturing much better quality videos and pictures and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than the Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Moto G Power. If you want to save some money, you can get the Moto G Power, letting go a couple features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.