Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.67 | 9.55 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 4.96 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has a score of 11.67, which is way better than Motorola Moto Z Force's 9.55 general score. Galaxy S21 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer, but thicker and notably heavier than Motorola Moto Z Force. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has an older 11 version and Motorola Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra features a bit more powerful processor than Moto Z Force, because it has 4 more cores and a larger amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better looking screen than Moto Z Force, because although it has a just a little less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a larger screen and a slightly better 1440 x 3200 resolution.
Moto Z Force counts with much more memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with a SD extension slot that admits up to 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S21 Ultra takes a lot better photographs and videos than Motorola Moto Z Force, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a lot higher resolution camera in the back and a lot better video quality.
Motorola Moto Z Force counts with a battery duration that is very similar to the battery life in Galaxy S21 Ultra, although the Motorola Moto Z Force has a 30 percent smaller battery size.
Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Motorola Moto Z Force, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto Z Force. So if you need that extra specs and features, you can buy Galaxy S21 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and get the Motorola Moto Z Force, giving up some features and specs.