Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 12 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2022-06-29 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.65 x 3.15 x 0.39 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 8.29 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 966.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 516 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 7.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.72 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.25 inches (1/4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | -- |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4050mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 98.1, which is way better than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro's general score of 77.6. Despite of the fact that the Galaxy S21 Ultra is older than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, it's body is a little bit lighter and somewhat thinner. These phones include Android OS, but Galaxy S21 Ultra has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover 6 Pro has Android 12 version.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3200px resolution, a higher pixels count per screen inch and a little bit bigger screen. The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a much powerful CPU than Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM.
Galaxy S21 Ultra takes much better pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a much more megapixels back camera and a lot larger sensor capturing much better quality photos. Galaxy XCover 6 Pro counts with a much better memory capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy S21 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal storage, the Galaxy XCover 6 Pro also has a SD memory slot that supports up to 1 TB.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with superior battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover 6 Pro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.