Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 98.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 516 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 Ultra is a lot better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 98.1 score against 80.1. The Galaxy S21 Ultra design is newer, somewhat lighter and a lot thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S21 Ultra has older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy S21 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a little lower display density, it also counts with a really larger display and a slightly higher resolution of 1440 x 3200 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing pictures and videos in low light situations, it also counts with a way better 108 megapixels resolution camera in the back, a much higher video resolution and a lot larger camera sensor which gives a lot higher image and video quality.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger memory capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra counts with just a little better battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is not only the best phones of the ones we are comparing here, but it's also cheap compared to the other phone, making this phone an easy choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.