Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 11.67 | 10.99 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-08-07 |
| 6.50 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches | 6.59 x 2.90 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.04 ounces | 6.46 ounces |
| Phantom black and Silver | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray and Mystic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 966.00 | $ 603.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3200 x 1440 pixels | 2636 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 516 pixels per inch | 425 pixels per inch |
| 1500 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.8 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3100 MHz) processor |
| 12 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.72 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 24.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 4.96 | 3.76 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.1 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra has an overall score of 11.67, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G's overall score of 10.99. Despite being the best phone in our current comparison, Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra is a heavier and thicker phone than the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G. Both phones in our current comparison include the same Android 11 operating system, so both of them should provide very similar operating system features.
Galaxy Z Flip 5G has just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S21 Ultra, although it has 4 GB less RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy S21 Ultra has a brighter display than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has a better 1440 x 3200 resolution, a bit greater screen density and a quite bigger display.
The Galaxy S21 Ultra shoots a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S21 Ultra also has a way better video resolution, a back-facing camera with lot more mega-pixels and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality videos and photos.
The Galaxy Z Flip 5G counts with a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S21 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra features a much better battery lifetime than Galaxy Z Flip 5G, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G. If you prefer to save some money, you can get the Samsung Galaxy Z Flip 5G, letting go a few features and specs, but you'll get the most out of your budget.