Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-29 | 2018-06-08 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 722.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a overall score of 91.8 against 81.3. Galaxy S21 is a much newer phone than the LG V35 ThinQ, although it's just a bit thicker and just a little bit heavier. LG V35 ThinQ's CPU is very similar to the CPU in Galaxy S21, and although the LG V35 ThinQ has 2 GB lesser RAM memory, they both have 8 cpu cores.
Samsung Galaxy S21 counts with a bit sharper screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a way worse 1080 x 2400 resolution and a little bit inferior number of pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a quite larger display. The LG V35 ThinQ features a lot bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21, because although it has less internal memory, it also counts with an external memory card slot that admits up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S21 features superior battery performance than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. Galaxy S21 captures slightly better photographs and videos than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photos or video in low-light situations and a back facing camera with a lot worse 12 mega pixels resolution, it also counts with a lot better video resolution and a lot larger sensor.
Although Galaxy S21 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG V35 ThinQ. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Galaxy S21, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the LG V35 ThinQ, letting go some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.