Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 87.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-03-20 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.67 x 3.06 x 0.35 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.72 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 722.00 | $ 333.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 has a global score of 91.8, which is slightly better than the LG V60 ThinQ's score of 87.6. The Galaxy S21 body is newer, a lot lighter and somewhat thinner than the LG V60 ThinQ. Both phones in this comparison have the same Android 11 OS (Operating System), so you shouldn't see any difference in that aspect.
LG V60 ThinQ features a processor that's very similar to the Galaxy S21 one, they have a Octa-Core processor and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Samsung Galaxy S21 has a brighter screen than LG V60 ThinQ, because although it has a little smaller display and a little worse 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a just a bit greater number of pixels per inch of display.
The Galaxy S21 has just a bit better camera than LG V60 ThinQ, although it has a smaller back camera sensor taking less light and washed colors, a back camera with way less megapixels resolution and a lower video quality, they both have a F1.8 aperture. The LG V60 ThinQ has a very superior memory capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21, and although they both have equal internal memory, the LG V60 ThinQ also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB.
LG V60 ThinQ counts with improved battery duration than Galaxy S21, because it has a 25 percent bigger battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy S21 is a better device, it is way more expensive than the LG V60 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V60 ThinQ. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S21, but if you don't you can save some money and get the LG V60 ThinQ, resigning a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.