Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-04-16 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.29 x 2.99 x 0.38 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | Smoke black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 722.00 | $ 150.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2300 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 424 pixels per inch | 397 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 665 SM6125 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 is a lot better than the Moto G Power, with a score of 91.8 against 76.1. Galaxy S21 is a newer phone, and it is also lighter and thinner than the Moto G Power. Both of these devices work with the same Android 11 OS. Samsung Galaxy S21 features a little bit better performance than Motorola Moto G Power, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 also has 4 GB more RAM.
Samsung Galaxy S21 features a more vivid screen than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a little bit better pixels count in each inch in the display and a slightly better resolution of 1080 x 2400px. The Galaxy S21 features a little bit better camera than Motorola Moto G Power, because although it has a tinier aperture and a back facing camera with a much worse 12 megapixels resolution, it also counts with a much bigger back-facing camera sensor and a lot better video definition.
The Moto G Power counts with a greater memory for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S21, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Moto G Power has improved battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy S21, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S21 is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Moto G Power, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola Moto G Power. So if you need that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy S21, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Motorola Moto G Power, resigning a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.