Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | Android 7.0 Nougat, 6.0 Marshmallow |
| 2021-01-29 | 2016-09-01 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Aluminum and Plastic | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 722.00 | $ 250.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
Galaxy S21 has an overall score of 91.8, which is much better than Moto Z Force's global score of 75.8. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S21 has the previous 11 version and Moto Z Force has Android 7.0 Nougat version. Galaxy S21's body is much newer than Moto Z Force's, but it's a bit heavier and just a bit thicker.
The Galaxy S21 counts with just a bit better screen than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a little bit lower pixel quantity in each inch in the display and a bit lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 pixels, it also counts with a quite larger screen. The Moto Z Force has a superior storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy S21, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory, it also counts with an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Galaxy S21 has a little better hardware performance than Moto Z Force, because it has more RAM memory and more CPU cores. The Galaxy S21 counts with a little longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z Force, because it has a 4000mAh battery size. The Galaxy S21 counts with just a bit better camera than Motorola Moto Z Force, because although it has a back camera with way less megapixels, and they both have a F1.8 diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S21 also counts with a way higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy S21 is way more expensive than Moto Z Force, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.