Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 11 | -- |
| 2021-01-29 | 2017-08-10 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 722.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | Super AMOLED |
| 424 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 10.78 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S21 is much better than Moto Z2 Force Edition, having a 91.8 score against 77.4. The Galaxy S21 design is a lot newer than the Moto Z2 Force Edition's, but it's heavier and thicker. Samsung Galaxy S21 has a bit sharper screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a just a bit worse pixels density and a quite lower 1080 x 2400 resolution, it also counts with a little bigger display.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition has a way bigger storage to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S21, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD extension slot that holds up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S21 counts with just a little better hardware performance than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy S21 also has more RAM.
Galaxy S21 counts with a much longer battery lifetime than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4000mAh battery size instead of 2730mAh. Galaxy S21 captures much better videos and photos than Moto Z2 Force Edition, and although they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Galaxy S21 also has a larger diafragm aperture for better low light images and videos, a much larger sensor providing a lot higher image quality and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Even being the best phone in this comparison, Galaxy S21 is also cheaper than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.