Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 91.8 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 11 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2021-01-29 | 2020-04-04 |
| 5.97 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches | 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches |
| 6.03 ounces | 9.03 ounces |
| Gray, Phantom pink, Violet and White | Black |
| Aluminum and Plastic | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 722.00 | $ 1105.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.2 inches | 5.1 inches |
| 2400 x 1080 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 424 pixels per inch | 576 pixels per inch |
| 1300 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.2 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 888 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Kryo 680, 64-bit, 5 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 660 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.63 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| 26.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 10.78 | 8.14 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 5.92 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| FM Radio | -- |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S21 is much better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having a global score of 91.8 against 80.1. These phones have Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S21 has the previous 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy S21's body is newer, noticeably lighter and a lot thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Galaxy S21 features a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a quite lower resolution of 1080 x 2400 and a much worse pixel density, it also counts with a larger screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features more storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S21, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB.
Galaxy S21 features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 cores, the Galaxy S21 also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S21 takes way better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for shooting images and/or video in low-light situations, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Galaxy S21 also counts with a way larger back camera sensor and a lot better video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little longer battery duration than Galaxy S21, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
In addition to being the best phone between the ones we are comparing, the Galaxy S21 is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes this phone a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.