Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-11-03 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.65 x 2.79 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Silver and Space gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1149.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2436 x 1125 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 463 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A11 Bionic APL1W72 (10 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 64-bit Monsoon and Mistral, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2390 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 3-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.17 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2716mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is a bit better than the iPhone X's 88.1 overall score. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra construction is a lot newer than the iPhone X's, although it is somewhat thicker and a lot heavier. IPhone X has a little faster processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory and a lower number of cores and slower, it also counts with a 64-bit CPU.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper display than iPhone X, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels, a little higher display pixels density, way more brightness and a bigger screen. The Apple iPhone X has a much better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a really longer battery lifetime than iPhone X, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 2716mAh. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior camera than iPhone X, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger camera sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a camera with much more megapixels.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little more expensive than Apple iPhone X, but you can get a better phone for that extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.