Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Apple |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-10-26 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.94 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue, Red, Rose gold, White and Yellow |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1792 x 828 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 324 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 625 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Apple A12 Bionic APL1W81 (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 64-bit Vortex and Tempest, 64-bit (Hexa-Core 2490 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Apple 4-core GPU GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.26 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 7.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.12 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2942mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the iPhone XR, getting a global score of 95.4 against 82. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra design is a lot newer, but somewhat heavier and just a little thicker than the iPhone XR. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better looking display than iPhone XR, because it has a much higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, much more display brightness, a way greater number of pixels per screen inch and a little bigger screen.
Apple iPhone XR features a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has lesser RAM and an inferior number of cores, it also counts with a 64-bits processor. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a very superior storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than iPhone XR, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really longer battery duration than iPhone XR, because it has a 70 percent more battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than Apple iPhone XR, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back facing camera with much more mega pixels, a much better video quality and a much larger back camera sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than iPhone XR, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.