Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-10-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.22 x 3.02 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.17 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 152.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2350 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3520mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Google Pixel 2 XL, having a global score of 95.4 against 82.5. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is a lot newer than Google Pixel 2 XL's, but it is thicker and heavier. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better hardware performance than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a brighter screen than Google Pixel 2 XL, because although it has a bit lower pixel number in each inch in the display, it also counts with a little bigger screen and a slightly higher 1440 x 3088px resolution. Google Pixel 2 XL's storage for games and applications is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one, both have exactly the same internal storage.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots way better photos and videos than Google Pixel 2 XL, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much better 7680x4320 video quality, a much higher resolution back camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a superior battery life than Google Pixel 2 XL, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3520mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Google Pixel 2 XL, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Google Pixel 2 XL. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 2 XL, letting go a couple features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.