Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 80 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-10-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.73 x 2.69 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.22 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Pink and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 157.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 439 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2915mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.88 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Google Pixel 3, with a 95.4 score against 80. Even though the Galaxy S22 Ultra is notably newer than the Google Pixel 3, it's incredibly heavier and thicker. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a sharper screen than Google Pixel 3, because it has a just a bit greater pixel quantity per display inch, a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a larger screen.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a superior storage capacity for games and applications than Google Pixel 3, because it has 64 GB more internal memory. Google Pixel 3's processor is very similar to Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's processor, and although the Google Pixel 3 has 4 GB less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processor.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much longer battery performance than Google Pixel 3, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures much clearer videos and photos than Google Pixel 3, and although they both have a same size camera aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much better image and video quality, a way higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with lot more megapixels.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Google Pixel 3, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3. So if you want that extra specs and features, you can buy Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save a couple dollars and buy the Google Pixel 3, giving up a couple specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.