Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-05-07 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.30 x 3.00 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Purple and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 167.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 670 SDM670 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 360, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 615 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3700mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.68 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the Google Pixel 3a XL, with a 95.4 score against 78.9. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is extremely newer than Google Pixel 3a XL's, but it is just a little thicker and extremely heavier. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version while Google Pixel 3a XL has Android 11, so it gives you a lot of extra features and enhanced performance.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processing unit than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a better resolution of 1440 x 3088, a bit larger display and a little greater display pixel density.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much greater storage to install applications and games than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures greater photographs and videos than Google Pixel 3a XL, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a back camera with much more mega pixels and a way larger sensor capturing much better quality photos.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has longer battery life than Google Pixel 3a XL, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity instead of 3700mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Google Pixel 3a XL, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 3a XL. If you prefer to save a few dollars, you can get Google Pixel 3a XL, giving up a few features and specifications, but you will get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.