Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2019-10-24 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.79 x 2.71 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.71 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Clearly white, Just black and Oh so orange |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 443 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 7.7 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 2800mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 4.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Google Pixel 4, having a score of 95.4 against 81.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is a lot newer, but just a little bit thicker and way heavier than the Google Pixel 4. The Google Pixel 4 features a bit faster CPU than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 cpu cores.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid display than Google Pixel 4, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a little greater count of pixels in each inch in the display and a larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much greater storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Google Pixel 4, because it has 64 GB more internal storage.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better battery performance than Google Pixel 4, because it has a 79% bigger battery size. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 4, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality, a much better 7680x4320 video resolution and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 4, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as Google Pixel 4. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, but if you don't you can save some money and buy the Google Pixel 4, resigning a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.