Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-10-15 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.70 x 2.77 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.33 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Just black and Sorta sage |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 548.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 430 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 28.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4080mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is a little bit better than the Google Pixel 5, having a 95.4 score against 89. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is newer than Google Pixel 5's, although it's somewhat thicker and way heavier. Google Pixel 5 features just a little better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. Both have the same number of cores and a 8 GB RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Google Pixel 5, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bit greater display pixel density and a little larger display. The Google Pixel 5 has as much memory capacity to store more games and applications as the Galaxy S22 Ultra, both of them have exactly the same 128 GB internal storage capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has improved battery performance than Google Pixel 5, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater photos and videos than Google Pixel 5, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor, a way higher video definition and a much better 108 mega pixels resolution back facing camera.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than Google Pixel 5, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Google Pixel 5. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save some dollars and buy the Google Pixel 5, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.