Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-07-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.99 x 2.83 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.28 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | -- |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass, Metal and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 449.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 431 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Tensor (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G78 MP20 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.20 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.79 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4410mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a general score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Google Pixel 6a's global score of 76.4. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a noticeably heavier device than Google Pixel 6a, but both of them are equally thin. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Google Pixel 6a has Android 12 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking display than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a just a little more pixels per display inch, a little bit larger display and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a very superior processor than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a higher amount of RAM and a greater number of cores.
The Google Pixel 6a has as much memory to store more apps and games as the Galaxy S22 Ultra one, both of them have equal internal memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a bit better battery duration than Google Pixel 6a, because it has a 13% greater battery size. The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than Google Pixel 6a, because although it has a smaller camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photos and video, it also counts with a way more MP back-facing camera and a way better 7680x4320 video definition.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more than the Google Pixel 6a, but it's still a convenient choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.