Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 501 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than Honor Magic 6 Pro, with a 95.4 score against 76.6. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design has the same thickness and weight than Honor Magic 6 Pro. These phones include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Honor Magic 6 Pro has Android 14.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro counts with a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Honor Magic 6 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a more vivid screen than Honor Magic 6 Pro, and although they both have a screen with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a little bit higher 1440 x 3088px resolution and a just a bit higher quantity of pixels per inch of screen.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures better photos and videos than Honor Magic 6 Pro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is not good for capturing photographs or videos in low light situations, it also counts with a back-facing camera with a much higher resolution, a way better 7680x4320 video definition and a bigger sensor which gives a higher photo and video quality.
The Honor Magic 6 Pro features a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 512 GB internal storage. Honor Magic 6 Pro has just a little bit longer battery duration than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.