Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | -- |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.08 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Epi Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 501 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | -- |
| Nano SIM | Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Honor Magic6 Pro, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 76.6. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra body has the same thickness and weight than Honor Magic6 Pro. These devices have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and Honor Magic6 Pro has Android 14.
The Honor Magic6 Pro has a bit better processing unit than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Honor Magic6 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a sharper display than Honor Magic6 Pro, and although they both have a same size screen, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a quite better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little greater pixel amount per inch in the display.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much clearer pictures and videos than Honor Magic6 Pro, because although it has a much smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photography, it also counts with a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution, a camera with way more mega-pixels and a larger sensor.
The Honor Magic6 Pro counts with a much better storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 384 GB more internal memory. The Honor Magic6 Pro features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 5600mAh of battery capacity against 5000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.