Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 92.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-03-22 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.40 x 2.98 x 0.35 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.36 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Agate Grey and Frozen Berry |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass and Titanium |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 1389.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2800 x 1280 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | LTPO |
| 501 pixels per inch | 453 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 5000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | 1x Cortex-X4 3.3GHz, 3x Cortex-A720 3.2GHz, 2x Cortex- A720 3.0GHz, 2x Cortex-A520 2.3GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 24 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 750 GPU |
| 9.36 | 10.08 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 1 TB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 23.2 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.49") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 7.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, having a overall score of 95.4 against 92.1. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body has the same thickness than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, but it's a bit lighter. These phones have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version and Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has Android 14 version.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design has a sharper display than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a bit lower 1280 x 2800 resolution and a little worse display pixel density, and they both have a screen of the same size, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also counts with a way brighter screen.
The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit more powerful processor than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design counts with a much greater storage for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory.
Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design features a bit better battery duration than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has a 5600mAh battery capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior camera than Honor Magic6 RSR Porsche Design, because although it has a much smaller aperture which is not nice for shooting images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition, a larger camera sensor which provides a higher image and video quality and a much more megapixels camera.
Even being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, the Galaxy S22 Ultra is also a bit cheaper, making it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.