Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | HTC |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2017-02-21 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.39 x 3.14 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 749.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | S-LCD 5 |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 821 MSM8996 Pro-AB chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2150 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than HTC U Ultra, with a 95.4 score against 77. Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer than HTC U Ultra's, but it's somewhat thicker and noticeably heavier. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking display than HTC U Ultra, because although it has a just a bit less pixels per screen inch, it also counts with a bit higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution and a bigger display.
The HTC U Ultra counts with a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD card slot that supports up to 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit more powerful processor than HTC U Ultra, because it has a larger amount of RAM memory and more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really longer battery lifetime than HTC U Ultra, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots a lot better pictures and videos than HTC U Ultra, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with way more megapixels, a lot bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality and a way higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra costs a lot more money than HTC U Ultra, but it's still a good choice, as you can get a lot more features for that extra money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.