Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-11-23 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blue, Red and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the LG K52, having a 95.4 score against 76. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while LG K52 has Android 10, giving a couple nice extra features. The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a newer phone than LG K52, but it is a bit thicker and somewhat heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than LG K52, because it has a lot higher count of pixels per inch in the display, a little bigger screen and a way higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. LG K52 features a much better storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that supports up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little bit better hardware performance than LG K52, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra features longer battery duration than LG K52, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots greater pictures and videos than LG K52, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much bigger sensor which offers a lot better image and video quality, a lot better 7680x4320 video resolution and a camera in the back with a much better 108 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.