Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-11-27 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.50 x 3.02 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Sky Blue and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 266 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 28.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot better than the LG K62, having a overall score of 95.4 against 78.2. Both of these phones work with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has newer 13 version and LG K62 has Android 10 version, so it provides the user some extra features and performance optimizations. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than the LG K62, it's heavier and a little bit thicker.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit superior processing unit than LG K62, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has 4 GB more RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much sharper display than LG K62, because it has a much higher display density, a lot higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a little bit larger screen.
The LG K62 features a superior memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the LG K62 also has a SD card slot that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much better videos and photos than LG K62, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera with a way higher 108 megapixels resolution, a lot larger back camera sensor shooting way higher quality pictures and a lot better 7680x4320 video quality.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features improved battery life than LG K62, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.