Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 85.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-11-06 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.55 x 3.04 x 0.33 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.14 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Titan gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 690 SM6350 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 560, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is better than LG K92's global score of 85.4. Even though the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is newer than LG K92, it is just a bit thicker and somewhat heavier. Both phones in this review include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version and LG K92 has Android 10 version.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features an incredibly better looking screen than LG K92, because it has more pixels per inch of display, a bit larger screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little better hardware performance than LG K92, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The LG K92 features a way bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same 128 GB internal memory, the LG K92 also has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1,95 TB. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a better camera than LG K92, and although they both have a same size diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a way better 7680x4320 video definition, a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot bigger camera sensor capturing lot higher quality videos and photographs.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery life than LG K92, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG K92, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG K92. So if you want that extra features, you can buy Galaxy S22 Ultra, else you can save a couple dollars and get the LG K92, letting go a couple specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.