Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 76.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-05-20 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.75 x 3.06 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.76 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Holographic white |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 233.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2460 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 395 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Helio P35 MT6765 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is way better than the LG Stylo 6, getting a score of 95.4 against 76.7. These devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while LG Stylo 6 has Android 10 version. Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is newer than the LG Stylo 6's, although it's a little thicker and a bit heavier.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking display than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a display with the same size, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher pixel quantity per inch in the screen and a higher 1440 x 3088 pixels resolution. Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better processing power than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a greater amount of RAM.
Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better videos and photos than LG Stylo 6, and although they both have a same size aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot better video definition, a way more mega pixels back-facing camera and a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors.
LG Stylo 6 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with superior battery lifetime than LG Stylo 6, because it has a 25 percent greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is way more expensive than LG Stylo 6, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as LG Stylo 6. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG Stylo 6, and give up a few specs and features, but you'll get the most out of your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.