Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 5.1 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2015-10-01 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 3.12 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Blue, Brown and White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Stainless steel |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 285.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1440 x 2560 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 9.9 | 9.4 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 808 MSM8992 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | ARM Cortex-A57 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit (Single-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB (933 MHz) RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 418 GPU |
| 9.36 | 8.28 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSD, microSDHC, microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.38 inches (1/2.6") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | SIM |
| 10.6 | 7.2 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| -- | 120 hours standby time 10 hours talk time |
| 6.8 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is way better than the LG V10's general score of 78.6. Even though Galaxy S22 Ultra is much newer than LG V10, it is just a bit thicker and heavier. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has the newer 13 version and LG V10 has Android 5.1 version.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit sharper display than LG V10, because although it has a just a bit worse quantity of pixels per inch of display, it also counts with a larger display and a quite better 1440 x 3088 resolution. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a quite superior performance than LG V10, because it has more cpu cores and more RAM.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better camera than LG V10, and although they both have a F1.8 aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot more MP camera, a way higher video definition and a lot bigger sensor. LG V10 counts with a lot bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal memory capacity, it also counts with an external memory slot that holds up to 1,95 TB.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features a way better battery lifetime than LG V10, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more money than LG V10, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as LG V10. If you want to save some money, you can get the LG V10, and give up a couple features and specs, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.