Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 82.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 8.0 Oreo |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-03-09 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | 16 777 216 |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 930.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 17.06 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than LG V30S ThinQ, getting a general score of 95.4 against 82.5. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a much newer phone than the LG V30S ThinQ, although it is incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. These devices include Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an older 13 version and LG V30S ThinQ has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
LG V30S ThinQ counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a more vivid screen than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a just a little worse pixel density, it also counts with a slightly better resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels and a little bit bigger display.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a lot better camera than LG V30S ThinQ, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a lot higher resolution camera, a lot higher video resolution and a much bigger sensor which provides a much better photo and video quality. The LG V30S ThinQ has a lot bigger memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the LG V30S ThinQ also has an external memory slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much longer battery performance than LG V30S ThinQ, because it has a 52 percent bigger battery capacity.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is more expensive than LG V30S ThinQ, but you can get a better phone for that few more dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.