Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | LG |
| Android 13, 12 | -- |
| 2022-02-25 | 2018-06-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 5.97 x 2.97 x 0.29 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.57 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 261.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2880 x 1440 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 537 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 845 SDM845 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 385, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2800 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 630 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 30.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.09") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 5.28 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the LG V35 ThinQ, having a 95.4 score against 81.3. Galaxy S22 Ultra's construction is noticeably newer than LG V35 ThinQ's, but it's incredibly heavier and somewhat thicker. The LG V35 ThinQ counts with a bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better screen than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a little bit less pixels per display inch, it also counts with a quite bigger screen and a little higher 1440 x 3088 resolution. LG V35 ThinQ features a much greater storage capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has just 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for SD memory cards that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better camera than LG V35 ThinQ, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a way higher video resolution, a lot higher resolution back facing camera and a much larger back camera sensor taking way higher quality photographs and videos.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery duration than LG V35 ThinQ, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it costs a lot more than LG V35 ThinQ, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as LG V35 ThinQ. If you want to save a few dollars, you can get LG V35 ThinQ, letting go a couple features, but you will get the most out of your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.