Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Microsoft |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2020-09-10 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 7.36 x 5.72 x 0.19 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.82 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Glacier |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 540.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 8.1 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2700 x 1800 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | AMOLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 401 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 11.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 8.91 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 3577mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has an overall score of 95.4, which is much better than Microsoft Surface Duo's general score of 78.8. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's design is newer and a little lighter than Microsoft Surface Duo's, but it is also way thicker. Both phones we are comparing here work with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version while Microsoft Surface Duo has Android 10 version.
Microsoft Surface Duo features a little bit better hardware performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much better looking display than Microsoft Surface Duo, because although it has a bit smaller display and a quite lower 1440 x 3088 resolution, it also counts with a quite higher pixel count in each inch of display.
Microsoft Surface Duo's storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos is just as good as Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra's one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage. The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better pictures and videos than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a larger aperture to take better photography and video in poorly lited environments, a camera with a much higher resolution and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a way better battery life than Microsoft Surface Duo, because it has a 40% greater battery capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is a lot more expensive than the Microsoft Surface Duo, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.