Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11, 10 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-06-17 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.69 x 3.08 x 0.43 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 8.18 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black and Forged Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | IPS LCD |
| 501 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 SM6115 chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 610 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.22 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola Defy (2021), getting a 95.4 score against 77.2. These phones come with Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Defy (2021) has Android 11 version. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a just a little lighter and thinner phone than Motorola Defy (2021), although both were only released 8 months apart.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit better processing power than Motorola Defy (2021), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has more RAM memory. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better display than Motorola Defy (2021), because it has a way greater pixel quantity per screen inch, a quite bigger screen and a way higher resolution of 1440 x 3088 pixels.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra shoots much better photographs and videos than Motorola Defy (2021), because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a way higher video definition, a much bigger back-facing camera sensor which gives a much higher image and video quality and a lot more mega-pixels back facing camera.
Motorola Defy (2021) counts with a better memory capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Motorola Defy (2021) has a battery performance that's very similar to the battery lifetime in Galaxy S22 Ultra.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.