Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.28 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Frosted Emerald, Frosted Grey and Frosted White |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | -- |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 670 Prime, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (920 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is much better than the Motorola Edge 20's overall score of 86.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 has Android 11. Although it's the best device we are comparing, we must tell that it's also a noticeably heavier and somewhat thicker device.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much more vibrant screen than Motorola Edge 20, because it has a bit larger screen, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution and a better display density. The Motorola Edge 20 features as much memory for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, both of them have the same internal memory.
Motorola Edge 20 has a bit better performance than Galaxy S22 Ultra. They have a 8 GB RAM and the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better camera than Motorola Edge 20, and although they both have a same resolution camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger aperture for better low light photos and video and a lot better video quality.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features better battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.