Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 87.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.53 x 2.99 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Electric Graphite and Lagoon Green |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 720 MT6853V/ZA (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G57 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 10.1 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (120 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is just a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Lite, getting a overall score of 95.4 against 87.1. Despite being the best phone we are comparing, the Galaxy S22 Ultra design is heavier and just a little thicker than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. Both phones in this review work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Lite has Android 11.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has just a little better performance than Motorola Edge 20 Lite. They have 8 GB of RAM and 8 CPU cores. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, because it has a better 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a greater pixel quantity per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Lite, and although they both have a 108 mega-pixels resolution back camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution and a larger camera aperture to take better low light photos and video.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite features a much bigger storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have equal 128 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Edge 20 Lite also has a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB.
The Motorola Edge 20 Lite and Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra both count with very similar battery durations.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.