Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 92.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12, 11 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2021-08-19 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.70 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Blue Vegan Leather, Iridescent White and Midnight Blue |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragonn 870 SM8250-AC (7 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.9 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a bit better than the Motorola Edge 20 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 92.8. Both of these phones come with Android OS, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge 20 Pro has Android 12, so it provides you a couple additional features. Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is better than the Motorola Edge 20 Pro, we must tell that it is also a somewhat heavier and somewhat thicker cellphone.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much more vibrant display than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a little bigger screen and a better display pixels density. The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with much more storage to store more games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has more internal memory capacity.
The Motorola Edge 20 Pro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Motorola Edge 20 Pro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy S22 Ultra has a bit superior battery lifetime than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes a little bit better photos and videos than Motorola Edge 20 Pro, and although they both have the same 24 fps video frame rates, the same 7680x4320 video quality and a 108 MP resolution back facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a larger aperture for better low-light photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.