Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 84.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.33 x 2.92 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Mineral Gray |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | $ 498.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1050 (8 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Arm Cortex-A78 @ 2.5GHz and Arm Cortex-A55 @ 2.0GHz, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2500 MHz) processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Arm Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge (2022), having a 95.4 score against 84.7. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy S22 Ultra has a newer 13 version and Motorola Edge (2022) has Android 12 version, so it provides a couple nice extra features. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra's body is much heavier and a little bit thicker than the Motorola Edge (2022).
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much sharper display than Motorola Edge (2022), because it has a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a better pixel amount per inch in the display and a little bit larger display. The Motorola Edge (2022) and Galaxy S22 Ultra both count with very similar memory capacity for games and applications, they have equal internal memory capacity.
Motorola Edge (2022) features a bit superior processing unit than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra takes better photos and videos than Motorola Edge (2022), and although they both have the same aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a much more mega-pixels back facing camera and a lot higher 7680x4320 video definition.
The Motorola Edge (2022) has a battery duration that is just as good as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra one.
Although Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola Edge (2022), and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the Motorola Edge (2022). If you are trying to save some dollars, you can buy Motorola Edge (2022), and give up a few specs and features, but you will get the most with your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.