Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.24 x 2.83 x 0.30 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Aurora White, Cosmic Grey, Neptune Blue and Solar Gold |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 888+ SM8350 (5 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 660 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.65 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4400mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.24 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a global score of 95.4, which is a lot better than the Motorola Edge 30 Fusion's 78.5 global score. Both devices in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has a more recent 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has Android 12, so it gives a lot of extra features. Although Galaxy S22 Ultra is a better device than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, it must be told that it's also a thicker and way heavier device.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a much greater processing power than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion. Both have a Octa-Core processing unit and a 8 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better screen than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a lot brighter display, a higher 1440 x 3088 resolution, a just a little higher screen pixel density and a bit larger display.
Motorola Edge 30 Fusion has as much storage capacity to store more games and applications as the Galaxy S22 Ultra one, both of them have equal 128 GB internal storage capacity. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has a slightly better camera than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because although it has lower 24 fps video frame rate, and they both have the same aperture and the same video resolution, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a larger sensor which gives a better image and video quality and a back facing camera with lot more mega-pixels.
Galaxy S22 Ultra features just a bit better battery performance than Motorola Edge 30 Fusion, because it has a 14 percent bigger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.