Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 83.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 12 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2022-09-08 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 5.47 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Aqua Foam, Black Onyx, Ice Palace and Very Peri |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | -- |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 418 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | -- |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 SM6375 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | Octa-Core 2200 MHz processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.36 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | -- |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (120 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.33 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4020mAh Dual Nano SIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a score of 95.4, which is better than the Motorola Edge 30 Neo's overall score of 83.1. Despite being the best we compare here, we must tell that it's also somewhat thicker and extremely heavier. These devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has 13 version while Motorola Edge 30 Neo has Android 12 version, so it gives a lot of extra features.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better looking screen than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a better 1440 x 3088px resolution, a quite greater pixel density and a little larger screen. Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra and Motorola Edge 30 Neo have extremely similar memory for applications and games, both of them have equal internal memory capacity.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a bit more powerful processing unit than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have a Octa-Core processing unit, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a higher amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy S22 Ultra has greater battery life than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, because it has a 24 percent more battery size.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra captures way better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 30 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back camera with lot more megapixels and a lot higher 7680x4320 video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.