Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-09-14 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.00 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black, Caneel Bay and Soothing Sea |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | -- |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G610 MC3 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | -- |
| 6.8 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Neo, getting a 95.4 score against 77. Despite being the best cellphone we compare here, it must be told that it's also older, incredibly heavier and thicker. Both of these phones use the same Android 13 OS (operating system). The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a very superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Both of them have a 8 GB RAM memory and the same number of cores.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better looking display than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, because it has more screen brightness, a little larger screen, a better 1440 x 3088 resolution and a just a bit greater pixel count in each screen inch. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo features as much memory capacity for games and applications as the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, both of them have exactly the same internal storage.
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo's battery lifetime is very similar to Galaxy S22 Ultra's battery life. The Galaxy S22 Ultra takes much clearer videos and photos than Motorola Edge 40 Neo, and although they both have the same aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a camera in the back with lot more MP, a larger camera sensor and a way better video resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.