Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 83.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 13 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2023-04-04 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.34 x 2.91 x 0.34 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Interstellar Black |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 1100 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 SM8550-AB (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 740 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 60.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | -- |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | 1920 x 1080 (960 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 13.75 | 12.87 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4600mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro, getting a 95.4 score against 83.4. Despite being the best in our current comparison, Galaxy S22 Ultra is an older, a little thicker and somewhat heavier cellphone than the Motorola Edge 40 Pro. These devices use the same Android 13 OS (Operating System).
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a way better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a sharper screen than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has a little bigger display, a better resolution of 1440 x 3088px, a higher number of pixels per display inch and a way brighter screen.
The Motorola Edge 40 Pro features a way bigger storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal memory. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra captures a little bit better photographs and videos than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because although it has worse video frame rate, and they both have the same video quality and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra also counts with a larger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution.
Galaxy S22 Ultra has a little longer battery life than Motorola Edge 40 Pro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.