Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 81.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-08-29 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.07 x 2.80 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Grisaille, Latte, Nautical Blue and Poinciana |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Plastic and Plastic |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2760 x 1256 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 474 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 3000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 10.2 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 73.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.67 inches (1/1.5") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.77 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4310mAh Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, with a overall score of 95.4 against 81.9. The Galaxy S22 Ultra design is noticeably older, just a little thicker and heavier than the Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but Galaxy S22 Ultra has the previous 13 version while Motorola Edge 50 Neo has Android 14 version.
The Galaxy S22 Ultra features a really superior hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo. Both have the same number of cores and 8 GB of RAM. Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because although it has a just a little inferior amount of pixels per inch of screen, a little smaller screen and a little bit lower 1256 x 2760px resolution, it also counts with much more brightness.
Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a better camera than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, and although they both have the same camera aperture, the Galaxy S22 Ultra also has a back facing camera with a lot higher resolution, a lot better video quality and a bigger camera sensor taking more light and vivid colors.
Motorola Edge 50 Neo counts with a very superior storage to install games and applications than Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 256 GB internal storage capacity. Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with longer battery performance than Motorola Edge 50 Neo, because it has a 5000mAh battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.