Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 95.4 | 86.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 13, 12 | Android 14 |
| 2022-02-25 | 2024-04-16 |
| 6.43 x 3.07 x 0.35 inches | 6.35 x 2.85 x 0.32 inches |
| 8.08 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Burgundy, Green, Phantom Black and White | Black Beauty, Luxe Lavender, Moonlight Pearl and Vanilla Cream |
| Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) | Aluminum |
| Scratch-Resistant Glass | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1200.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 6.8 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 3088 x 1440 pixels | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| Dynamic AMOLED | P-OLED |
| 501 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| 1750 cd/m2 brightness | 2000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 9.9 | 9.3 |
| Performance | |
| Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 SM8450 (4 nm) chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 7 Gen 3 (4 nm) chipset |
| Quad-Core 2800 MHz + Quad-Core 1800 MHz processor | processor |
| 8 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Adreno 730 GPU | Adreno 720 GPU |
| 9.36 | 6.21 |
| Storage | |
| 128 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| No SD card slot | No SD card slot |
| 10.1 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 108.00 MP + 40.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.80 aperture | f/1.40 aperture |
| 23.00mm focal length | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor | 0.65 inches (1/1.55") sensor |
| 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video | -- |
| 13.75 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 10.6 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 5000mAh Battery | 4500mAh Nano SIM, eSIM Battery |
| Non-Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| Wireless Charging | Wireless Charging |
| 6.8 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.2 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is much better than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro, getting a global score of 95.4 against 86.3. Both phones in this review work with Android OS, but Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has older 13 version and Motorola Edge 50 Pro has Android 14 version. Although it's the best in this comparison, the Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra is a incredibly older, heavier and a little bit thicker phone than the Motorola Edge 50 Pro.
The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a much better hardware performance than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, although it has 4 GB less RAM, they both have 8 cores. Galaxy S22 Ultra features a bit better display than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has less brightness, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of display, a little bigger display and a better 1440 x 3088 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra has a superior camera than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is not favorable for capturing images and/or video in poorly lited environments, it also counts with a larger camera sensor shooting higher quality videos and photos, a back camera with a lot better 108 mega-pixels resolution and a lot better video resolution.
The Motorola Edge 50 Pro counts with a lot bigger memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra, because it has 384 GB more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy S22 Ultra counts with a little longer battery life than Motorola Edge 50 Pro, because it has an 11% larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.